Implementation of E-consent in infectious & isolated patients: a novel cost-conserving technique
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v21.23812Keywords:
informed consent, COVID-19, electronic health records, healthcare cost, infection controlAbstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for innovative solutions to enhance infection prevention and control measures in healthcare settings, particularly for infectious and isolated patients.
Objective: To describe the implementation of a novel cost-conserving electronic procedural consent technique in infectious and isolated patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented an electronic consent technique using pre-existing hardware in the form of Toughbook tablets with styluses, and biohazard-grade ziplock bags. We trialled this method on patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 requiring surgery.
Results: This e-consent system was used in 83 patients undergoing surgery. Benefits included effective sanitization of the Toughbooks and the low cost. Challenges included suboptimal signature accuracy and the need for a back-up method when the Toughbook malfunctioned, or where e-signatures could not be obtained. The system was discontinued as the pandemic and isolation measures eased.
Discussion: The e-consent system provided a practical solution during the pandemic, reducing physical contact and supporting infection control. While effective, challenges related to technology and patient adaptability remained. The system demonstrated potential for broader applications, including in telemedicine and isolation care, but requires further evaluation in high-volume settings.
Conclusions: E-consent effectively minimized the risk of infection transmission and improved consent workflows. Beyond the pandemic, e-consent offers long-term benefits in infection prevention, consent management, and remote access, supporting safer, more flexible patient care across clinical settings. However, further studies are needed to evaluate its impact on reducing infection transmission and personal protective equipment (PPE) waste.
Downloads
References
1. Chimonas S, Lipitz-Snyderman A, Matsoukas K, Kuperman G. Electronic consent in clinical care: an international scoping review. BMJ Health Care Inform 2023; 30(1): e100726. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100726
2. Mehraeen E, Salehi MA, Behnezhad F, Moghaddam HR, SeyedAlinaghi S. Transmission modes of COVID-19: a systematic review. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2021; 21(6): e170721187995. doi: 10.2174/1871526520666201116095934
3. Kampf G, Todt D, Pfaender S, Steinmann E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J Hosp Infect 2020; 104(3): 246–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022
4. Mahmoudnia A, Mehrdadi N, Golbabaei Kootenaei F, Rahmati Deiranloei M, Al-E-Ahmad E. Increased personal protective equipment consumption during the COVID-19 pandemic: an emerging concern on the urban waste management and strategies to reduce the environmental impact. J Hazard Mater Adv 2022; 7: 100109. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100109
5. Gereffi G. What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies. J Int Bus Policy 2020; 3(3): 287–301. doi: 10.1057/s42214-020-00062-w
6. Bown CP. How COVID-19 medical supply shortages led to extraordinary trade and industrial policy. Asian Econ Policy Rev 2022; 17(1): 114–35. doi: 10.1111/aepr.12359
7. Jaton E, Stang J, Biros M, Staugaitis A, Scherber J, Merkle F, et al. The use of electronic consent for COVID-19 clinical trials: lessons for emergency care research during a pandemic and beyond. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27(11): 1183–6. doi: 10.1111/acem.14141
8. Rothwell E, Brassil D, Barton-Baxter M, Brownley KA, Dickert NW, Ford DE, et al. Informed consent: old and new challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Transl Sci 2021; 5(1): e105. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.401
9. Reeves JJ, Mekeel KL, Waterman RS, Rhodes LR, Clay BJ, Clary BM, et al. Association of electronic surgical consent forms with entry error rates. JAMA Surg 2020; 155(8): 777. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1014
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gerald Tse, Yoong Chuan Tay

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJIC. Read the full Copyright- and Licensing Statement.


