The physical effects of wearing personal protective equipment: a scoping review

  • Lyvonne N. Tume School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK; and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Davide Ungari Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Fariba Bannerman Alder Hey Library, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Sean Cuddihy Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Claire Gnanalingham Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
  • Hayley Phillips Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
Keywords: healthcare workers, personal protective equipment, physical effects, physiological effects, review

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has required healthcare workers to wear personal protective equipment (PPE), and although there is increasing awareness of the physical effects of wearing PPE, the literature has yet to be synthesised around this topic.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted to synthesise existing literature on the physical effects of wearing PPE and identify gaps in the literature. A comprehensive search strategy was undertaken using five databases from 1995 to July 2020.

Results: A total of 375 relevant articles were identified and screened. Twenty-three studies were included in this review. Studies were conducted across 10 countries, spanning 16 years from 2004 to 2020. Half (13/23) were randomised controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies, five surveys, two qualitative studies, two observational or case series and one Delphi study. Most (82%, 19/23) studies involved the N95 mask (either valved or unvalved). None specifically studied the filtering facepiece 3 mask. The main physical effects relate to skin irritation, pressure ulcers, fatigue, increased breathing resistance, increased carbon dioxide rebreathing, heat around the face, impaired communication and wearer reported discomfort. Few studies examined the impact of prolonged wear (akin to real life practice) on the physical effects, and different types of PPE had different effects.

Conclusions: The physical effects of wearing PPE are not insignificant. Few studies examined the physiological impact of wearing respiratory protective devices for prolonged periods whilst conducting usual nursing activity. No ideal respirators for healthcare workers exist, and the development of more ergonomic designs of PPE is required.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Houghton C, Meskell P, Delaney H, Smalle M, Glenton C, Booth A, et al. Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4(4): CD013582. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013582

Cowling BJ, Zhou Y, Ip DK, Leung GM, Aiello AE. Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review. Epidemiol Infect 2010 Apr; 138(4): 449–56. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809991658

Chou FR, Dana T, Jungbauer R, Weeks C, McDonagh MS. Masks for prevention of respiratory virus infections, including SARS-CoV-2, in health care and community settings: a living rapid review. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173(7): 542–55. doi: 10.7326/M20-3213

bin-Reza F, Lopez Chavarrias V, Nicoll A, Chamberland ME. The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence: masks and respirators to prevent influenza. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2012; 6(4): 257–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x

Smith JD, MacDougall CC, Johnstone J, Copes RA, Schwartz B, Garber GE. Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Med Assoc J 2016; 188(8): 567–74. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150835

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8(1): 19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7): 467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

Lam U, Md. Mydin Siddik NSF, Mohd Yussof SJ, Ibrahim S. N95 respirator associated pressure ulcer amongst COVID -19 health care workers. Int Wound J 2020; 17(5): 1525–7. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13398

Foo C, Goon A, Leow Y, Goh C. Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment against severe acute respiratory syndrome- a descriptive study in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55(5): 291–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00953.x

Hu K, Fan J, Li X, Gou X, Li X, Zhou X. The adverse skin reactions of health care workers using personal protective equipment for COVID-19. Medicine 2020; 99(24), e20603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020603

Lim E, Seet R, Lee K, Wilder-Smith EPV, Chuah BYS, Ong BKC. Headaches and the N95 facemask amongst healthcare providers. Acta Neurol Scand 2006; 113(3): 199–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00560.x

Corley A, Hammond NE, Fraser JF. The experiences of health care workers employed in an Australian intensive care unit during the H1N1 Influenza pandemic of 2009: a phenomenological study. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47(5): 577–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.015

Honarbakhsh M, Jahangiri M, Farhadi P. Effective factors on not using the N95 respirators among health care workers: application of fuzzy delphi and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). J Healthc Risk Manag 2017; 37(2): 36–46. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21286

Locatelli SM, LaVela SL, Gosch M. Health care workers’ reported discomfort while wearing filtering face-piece respirators. Workplace Health Saf 2014; 62(9): 362–8. doi: 10.3928/21650799-20140804-03

Parush A, Wacht O, Gomes R, Frenkel A Human factor considerations in using personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic context: binational survey study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(6):e19947. doi: 10.2196/19947

Radonovich LJ Jr, Cheng J, Shenal BV, Hodgson M, Bender BS. Respirator tolerance in health care workers. J Am Med Assoc 2009 Jan 7; 301(1): 36–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.894

Smith CL, Whitelaw JL, Davies B. Carbon dioxide rebreathing in respiratory protective devices: influence of speech and work rate in full-face masks. Ergonomics 2013; 56(5): 781–90. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.777128

Lee HP, Wang de Y. Objective assessment of increase in breathing resistance of N95 respirators on human subjects. Ann Occup Hyg 2011; Oct; 55(8): 917–21. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer065

Li Y, Tokura H, Guo YP, Wong ASW, Wong T, Chung J, et al. Effects of wearing N95 and surgical facemasks on heart rate, thermal stress and subjective sensations. Int Archiv Occup Environ Health 2005; 78(6): 501–9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0584-4

Bansal S, Harber P, Yun D, Liu D, Liu Y, Wu S, et al. Respirator physiological effects under simulated work conditions. J Occup Environ Hyg 2009; 6(4): 221–7. doi: 10.1080/15459620902729218

Bulson D, Shawl K. Understanding the physiological effects of wearing enhanced personal protective equipment while providing patient care. J Emerg Manag 2019; 17(6): 517–21. doi: 10.5055/jem.2019.0444

Roberge RJ, Coca A, Williams WJ, Powell JB, Palmiero AJ. Physiological impact of the N95 filtering facepiece respirator on healthcare workers. Respir Care 2010; 55(5): 569–77.

Özdemir L, Azizoğlu M, Yapıcı D. Respirators used by healthcare workers due to the COVID-19 outbreak increase end-tidal carbon dioxide and fractional inspired carbon dioxide pressure. J Clin Anesth 2020; 66: 109901. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109901

Rebmann T, Carrico R, Wang J. Physiologic and other effects and compliance with long-term respirator use among medical intensive care unit nurses. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41(12): 1218–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.02.017

Powell JB, Kim JH, Roberge RJ. Powered air-purifying respirator use in healthcare: effects on thermal sensations and comfort. J Occup Environ Hyg 2017; 14(12): 947–54. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1358817

Zhu JH, Lee SJ, Wang DY, ÿLee H. Effects of long-duration wearing of N95 respirator and surgical facemask: a pilot study. J Lung Pulm Respir Res 2014; 1(4): 97–100. doi: 10.15406/jlprr.2014.01.00021

Shenal BV, Radonovich LJ, Cheng J, Hodgson M, Bender BS. Discomfort and exertion associated with prolonged wear of respiratory protection in a health care setting. J Occup Environ Hyg 2012; 9(1): 59–64. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.635133

Hines SE, Brown C, Oliver M, Gucer P, Frisch M, Hogan R, et al. User acceptance of reusable respirators in health care. Am J Infect Control 2019; 47(6): 648–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.11.021

Loibner M, Hagauer S, Schwantzer G, Berghold A, Zatloukal K. Limiting factors for wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) in a health care environment evaluated in a randomised study. PLoS One 2019; 14(1): e0210775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210775

Or P, Chung J, Wong T. A study of environmental factors affecting nurses’ comfort and protection in wearing N95 respirators during bedside procedures. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27: e1477–84. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14268

Gharni R. Is PPE working for women? Occup Health 2017; 13(6): 32–5.

Larson EL, Liverman CT. Editors. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel to Prevent Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Infections: Current Research Issues. Preventing transmission of pandemic influenza and other viral respiratory diseases: personal protective equipment for healthcare personnel: update 2010. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209584/ [cited 3 October 2020].

Fidler H. PPE: ‘One size fits all’ design is a fallacy that’s putting female health staff at risk. RCNi; 2020 May 4. Available from: https://rcni-com.salford.idm.oclc.org/nursing-standard/opinion/comment/ppe-one-size-fits-all-design-a-fallacy-thats-putting-female-health-staff-risk-160536 [cited 3 October 2020].

Chang JC, Johnson JS, Olmsted RN. Demystifying theoretical concerns involving respirators with exhalation valves during COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Infect Control 2020; 48(12): 1564–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.08.031

Gao Z, Yinghui Xu Y, Sun C, Wang X, Guo Y, Qiu S, et al. A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2021; 54(1): 12–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.05.001

Unison. Health and safety information sheet: temperatures at work. 2014. Available from: https://www.unison.org.uk/content/uploads/2013/06/Briefings-and-CircularsTemperature-at-Work-Information-Health-and-Safety-Information-Sheet2.pdf [cited 3 October 2020].

Roeckner JT, Krstić N, Sipe BH, Običan SG. N95 filtering facepiece respirator use during pregnancy: a systematic review. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37(10): 995–1001. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712475

Published
2022-06-03
How to Cite
Tume, L., Ungari, D., Bannerman, F., Cuddihy, S., Gnanalingham, C., & Phillips, H. (2022). The physical effects of wearing personal protective equipment: a scoping review. International Journal of Infection Control, 18. https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v18.22415
Section
Review Articles