@article{Tiwari_Patil_Naik_Shetty_Walia_Rodrigues_2021, title={Patient risk factor stratification is essential for the hospital antibiogram}, volume={17}, url={https://ijic.info/article/view/20089}, DOI={10.3396/ijic.v17.20089}, abstractNote={<p>Empiric antimicrobial therapy in hospitalized patients is guided by an institution’s cumulative antibiogram, which may not be adequate in giving information on decision-making for optimal treatment in different patient populations. Adding patient risk factors can make it more useful for clinicians in guiding empiric therapy and for antimicrobial stewardship. Cumulative data were obtained for blood culture and urine isolates from the laboratory information system of a tertiary care hospital for 6 months (January to June 2019). Further stratification of organism types and resistance rates on the basis of patient risk factors (Patient Types 1, 2, and 3) was performed and analyzed. <em>Salmonella</em> spp. was seen in community-acquired ward patients (Types 1 and 2). <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em> was seen in Type 1 patients, and <em>Acinetobacter</em> spp. was seen in Type 3 patients. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative infection rates were higher in community patients than in hospital patients. Carbapenem-resistant <em>Enterobacteriaceae</em> rates were high in Type 3 hospitalized patients. Cumulative blood methicillin-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> rates were 43% but stratification showed it only in Type 2 and Type 3 ICU patients with 0% in ward patients. Stratified antibiograms based on patient risk factors are valuable for antimicrobial stewardship and help to optimize empiric therapy and increase the understanding of antimicrobial resistance trends.</p>}, number={1}, journal={International Journal of Infection Control}, author={Tiwari, Karuna and Patil, Samruddhi and Naik, Aparna and Shetty, Anjali and Walia, Kamini and Rodrigues, Camilla}, year={2021}, month={Apr.} }