Is a stable positive rate of <0.1% an indication of a fresh outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3396/ijic.v17.20927Keywords:
COVID-19, coronavirus, incidence rate, lockdown, pandemic, New ZealandAbstract
This letter gives a short analysis of the rate of positive SARS-CoV-2 tests in New Zealand and the restrictions that were implemented in response to these rates changing. Concerned about the growth of the number of positive cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the New Zealand government introduced stricter lockdown measures on August 16, 2020, and on August 18, 2020, it postponed elections planned for September. Growth in the number of positive cases was an artifact of the number of tests growing at a higher rate than the number of positive cases. The positive rate on August 16 was 0.05% (13 positive cases from 26,014 tests). On August 2, the positive rate was higher at 0.18% (three positive cases from 1,692 tests), despite the government considering that the virus was eradicated at this time. A better approach to this pandemic would be the development of policies based on the positive rate, not solely on positive case numbers, and to include viral load using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests with an appropriate cycle threshold to properly identify infectious cases. It is also advised to protect vulnerable populations and avoid unnecessary limitations to the healthy population. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic will last longer than several months, and the sooner life gets back to nearly normal, the better.
Downloads
References
Hollingsworth J. CNN New Zealand imposes 12-day lockdown in its biggest city as it battles fresh outbreak. 2020. Available from: edition.cnn.com/2020/08/14/asia/new-zealand-coronavirus-lockdown-intl-hnk/index.html [cited 12 October 2020].
Cullinane S, Beech S. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern delays election over Covid-19. 2020. Available from: edition.cnn.com/2020/08/16/asia/new-zealand-ardern-election-delay-coronavirus/index.html [cited 12 October 2020].
Boretti A. Cycle threshold as a measure of infectivity from Covid-19 PCR tests. Afr J Respir Med 2020; 15(1): 13–15.
Tom MR, Mina MJ. To interpret the SARS-CoV-2 test, consider the cycle threshold value. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(16): 2252–4. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa619
Joynt GM, Wu WK. Understanding COVID-19: what does viral RNA load really mean? Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20(6): 635–6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30237-1
Geddes L. Puzzle over viral load. New Sci 2020; 245(3276): 8. doi: 10.1016/S0262-4079(20)30658-8
Jefferson T, Heneghan C. COVID-19: clinical utility of cycle threshold values. 2020. Available from: www.cebm.net/study/covid-19-clinical-utility-of-cycle-threshold-values/ [cited 12 October 2020].
Mandavilli A. Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be. 2020. Available from: www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html [cited 12 October 2020].
Boretti A. After less than 2 months, the simulations that drove the world to strict lockdown appear to be wrong, the same of the policies they generated. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2020; 7: 1–11. doi: 10.1177/2333392820932324
Boretti A. Sustainable post Covid19 lockdown strategy through evidence-based policy: analysis of Covid19 fatalities across Europe. Integr J Med Sci 2020; 7: 172. doi: 10.15342/ijms.7.172
Boretti A. Covid19 outbreak in Victoria, Australia update August 1, 2020. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol 2020. doi: 10.1177/2333392820960350
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to IJIC. Read the full Copyright- and Licensing Statement.
